by Taghreed Saadeh
The controversy between Irish hip-hop group Kneecap and Canadian MP Vince Gasparro has become one of the most prominent cultural and political debates between Canada and the United Kingdom in recent times, expanding from a disagreement over entry into the country to a defamation case pursued by artists against an elected Canadian official.
The case, which began with a brief announcement on social media, quickly escalated into a wider discussion about political censorship, artistic freedom of expression, and the politicization of security issues in Canada.
Last September, Liberal MP Vince Gasparro posted a video claiming that Kneecap was barred from entering Canada due to glorifying “terrorist organizations” in their music, adding that he was speaking “on behalf of the Government of Canada.” The video quickly went viral and sparked significant controversy, particularly as the band was preparing to perform in Canadian cities including Toronto and Vancouver, with tickets already sold out.
Following the MP’s statement, the band announced the cancellation of their concerts, which some interpreted as confirmation of the official narrative. However, subsequent reports raised new questions, revealing that Gasparro’s claim was not accurate.
Canadian media reported that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), and the Prime Minister’s Office were not aware of the MP’s statement in advance. Government sources clarified that only one band member’s electronic travel authorization (eTA) was canceled for technical or procedural reasons, while the applications of the other two members were under regular review.
This meant that the band was not barred from entering Canada as Gasparro claimed, and no official decision had been made to that effect. The situation was merely part of routine administrative procedures encountered by hundreds of travelers weekly.
This information changed the narrative, making the MP’s statements appear to be political exaggeration over a simple administrative matter, or an attempt to make a political point using an artistic issue.
The Irish band quickly responded by initiating legal action against Gasparro for defamation, arguing that his statements had harmed their international reputation. The band stated that the MP’s claims were “false, misleading, and caused us direct harm.”
The Irish human rights law firm Phoenix Law took on the case, with lawyer Dara Mackin describing Gasparro’s statements as “dangerous and inaccurate,” emphasizing that the band had received no official government notification of being barred and that the travel procedures were “administrative rather than punitive.”
The band also announced that any potential compensation would be donated to children in Gaza.
Kneecap is well-known in the United Kingdom and Ireland for its pro-Palestinian positions and outspoken criticism of Israel and its policies, as well as its explicit engagement with issues of identity and politics in Northern Ireland.
These positions have consistently made the band a target of criticism from certain right-wing or pro-Israel groups, particularly in Canada, where the political discourse around Palestine intensified in 2024–2025.
Analysts suggest that Gasparro’s move was not isolated, but part of a broader political polarization, with some actors attempting to take a stance “against extremism,” even in the absence of a legal basis.
In Canada. MPs questioned why the MP disseminated inaccurate information and whether he used his position to make a political statement on a matter outside his administrative jurisdiction. Some commentators viewed the incident as a clear example of the politicization of culture and art in Canada, while supporters of Gasparro argued that he was “warning of national security risks.”
70 Total Count
